Three private-equity-backed RIA acquirers opened June 2026 with deals announced inside a single business week, and the pattern in those deals matters more than the count. Modern Wealth Management bought a $1.1 billion Florida firm, its 22nd acquisition since launching in 2023. Waverly Advisors closed on a Maryland RIA and a tax-and-accounting firm in the same transaction, pushing it to 33 deals and roughly $35.5 billion in assets. Arax Investment Partners, six acquisitions into the year, welcomed a $1.5 billion team of Wells Fargo breakaways in the Hudson Valley. Read together, the week shows serial acquirers running two playbooks at once: classic tuck-ins and wirehouse recruiting, with adjacent professional services bolted on top.
For a principal weighing a sale, and for the advisors watching where the leverage sits, the early-June tape is a useful snapshot of how the buyers have changed. They are no longer simply rolling up small RIAs. They are assembling integrated platforms, and they are paying for relationships they can keep.
Key Takeaways
- Modern Wealth, Waverly, and Arax each announced or closed deals in the first business week of June 2026, all three backed by private equity.
- Waverly’s purchase of Cooley & Associates added tax preparation and accounting to the platform, a tuck-in pattern spreading across the industry.
- Arax’s $1.5 billion Wells Fargo breakaway team shows aggregators competing for wirehouse talent as readily as for whole RIAs.
- Echelon Partners counted a record 142 RIA M&A deals in Q1 2026, with private equity involved in 71.8% of them.
- The same private capital is now bidding for CPA firms and RIAs at once, so sellers face buyers assembling tax, estate, and investment services under one roof.
The First-Week-of-June Deal Tape
Modern Wealth Management’s purchase of Flaharty Asset Management set the tone. The Clearwater and Punta Gorda firm oversees about $1.1 billion across advisory and brokerage assets with an 18-person team that includes nine advisors, and the deal closed on May 29 ahead of an early-June announcement. It was Modern Wealth’s 22nd acquisition since the firm launched in 2023 and its second in Florida inside roughly two months. A buyer that has averaged better than one deal a month since inception is not opportunistic. It is running a machine.
Waverly Advisors moved on the same week with a different texture. The Birmingham, Alabama firm acquired WealthPlans, a Frederick, Maryland RIA, and through its Waverly Business Services affiliate it also bought Cooley & Associates, a tax preparation and accounting practice in the same market. Both closed May 29 and lifted Waverly to about $35.5 billion in assets. It was the firm’s 33rd transaction since taking a December 2021 equity investment from Wealth Partners Capital Group and HGGC’s Aspire platform. Across roughly four and a half years, that cadence works out to a closed deal about every seven weeks.
Arax Investment Partners, backed by RedBird Capital Partners, supplied the third pattern. Rather than buy a standalone RIA, Arax brought over a $1.5 billion team breaking away from Wells Fargo in the Hudson Valley, its sixth deal of the year. Three buyers, one week, three distinct ways of adding assets. The throughline is private capital and a refusal to grow one way only.
Why Are RIA Acquirers Buying Tax and Accounting Firms?

Waverly’s pickup of a CPA firm alongside an RIA is the detail worth sitting with, because it is becoming common rather than novel. Registered investment advisers are expanding past investment management into tax planning and accounting, absorbing adjacent firms to own more of the client relationship. The logic tightened after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reset the tax code, leaving high-net-worth households with permanent higher exemptions, new phaseouts, and planning decisions that run straight through the 1040.
An advisor who can prepare the return, rather than react to it after the fact, controls the most recurring, most trusted touchpoint a wealthy client has. Tax season is the one appointment every client keeps. Owning the preparation work converts an annual compliance chore into a year-round planning relationship, and it walls off the account from a competitor who only manages money. The recurring revenue from a tax practice also smooths the lumpy, market-dependent fees of pure asset management.
The competitive twist is that the same private equity money funding RIA roll-ups is now funding accounting-firm roll-ups. A wealth manager bidding for a regional CPA practice is increasingly bidding against a PE-backed accounting consolidator chasing the identical book. Buyers like Waverly are acquiring tax capacity partly to deepen client service and partly to take it off the table before a rival platform does. The professional-services tuck-in has turned into a defensive move as much as an offensive one, and it sits in the same consolidation logic that has private equity involved in nine of every ten RIA deals.
The Two-Front Model: Tuck-Ins and Breakaways at Once
For years the industry kept two categories separate. Aggregators bought whole RIAs. Recruiters and platforms lured breakaway teams off wirehouses. Arax’s $1.5 billion Wells Fargo team shows those lanes merging. The aggregators have learned that a brokerage team ready to go independent is an acquisition target too, just one that arrives as advisors and assets rather than as a corporate entity with a balance sheet.
The two-front model gives a serial acquirer two pipelines feeding the same platform. When RIA seller supply tightens or valuations run hot, the buyer leans into wirehouse recruiting, where the cost of adding assets is a transition package rather than a full enterprise multiple. When breakaway activity cools, it leans back into tuck-ins. Running both smooths the growth rate and reduces the buyer’s dependence on any single source of deals.
It also changes the math for sellers and recruits. A breakaway team evaluating independence now has aggregators competing to host it, financing the move and handling operations, which lowers the friction that once kept advisors at the wirehouse. The same platform pursuing that team is also courting the retiring RIA founder down the road. The consolidation pressure that produced mega-team weeks and billion-dollar recruiting moves is now standard operating procedure, not an event.
What the Q1 2026 Record Tells Us About the Pace

The June flurry is not noise against a quiet backdrop. It is the continuation of the most active stretch the industry has recorded. Echelon Partners counted 142 RIA M&A transactions in the first quarter of 2026, a record that beat the previous high of 125 set in two separate prior quarters. The assets that changed hands reached $1.67 trillion, more than double the $805 billion in the same period a year earlier, a 107% jump. Private equity was involved in 102 of those deals, or 71.8%, including a record 95 PE-sponsored transactions.
DeVoe & Company, which counts deals on a stricter methodology, logged 93 transactions in Q1, up 24% year over year and tying the busiest quarter it has tracked, with the average seller managing $1.16 billion as deals moved upmarket. Echelon projects full-year 2026 volume reaching 475 transactions, edging past 2025’s record of 466. The early-June deals from Modern Wealth, Waverly, and Arax are three data points inside a curve still bending upward.
The persistence of the pace is the signal. After several years of predictions that rising rates or a saturated buyer field would slow consolidation, the buyers keep finding capital and the sellers keep coming, with the average deal getting larger as the supply of sellers concentrates at the top of the market. We track the named transactions, buyer cadence, and PE share quarter by quarter in our RIA M&A Deal Tracker, updated as the deals land.
What Does This Mean for a Seller Right Now?
A principal thinking about a sale in 2026 is negotiating with a different buyer than existed five years ago, and the differences cut both ways. The good news is leverage. Record deal volume, a record share of PE-backed bidders, and rising average deal size mean a quality firm with clean books and a growing client base has more credible buyers than ever, and the upmarket drift in DeVoe’s data shows larger sellers commanding attention.
The complication is fit. A buyer assembling an integrated platform with tax, estate, and accounting under one roof is buying capabilities and culture, rather than a revenue stream alone. The seller who fits the platform’s model commands a premium. The seller who does not, the lifestyle practice with idiosyncratic systems and a founder unwilling to integrate, may find the field of serious bidders thinner than the headline deal count suggests. The record volume is real, and it is also selective.
Timing favors preparation over waiting. The valuations are strong now, the capital is available now, and the buyers are active now. A seller who spends a year cleaning up financials, documenting the client base, and clarifying succession enters that market from strength. One who waits for a better number, while the field of buyers narrows around platform fit, is taking a bet on conditions staying this favorable, and the pace set across 2026’s record quarters will not stay this hot forever.
Three Questions for a Selling Principal
The early-June deals reward sellers who treat a sale as a strategic decision rather than a payday, and three questions sharpen the thinking before the first conversation with a buyer.
1. Does this buyer want my firm, or my firm’s place on its platform? Understand whether the acquirer is buying your client relationships and team to keep, or buying scale to fold into a centralized model that will reassign clients and retire your brand. The answer changes the price, the earn-out, and your role afterward.
2. What happens to my tax and planning relationships under the buyer’s model? If the acquirer runs integrated tax and accounting, decide whether that strengthens your client offering or strips work you valued from your team. A platform that absorbs the 1040 may deepen retention or may sideline the advisors who built those relationships.
3. Am I selling from strength or from fatigue? A principal who has prepared the financials, documented the book, and clarified succession negotiates from leverage. One selling because the operational grind wore them down negotiates from need, and buyers running a deal a month can read the difference.
About Me
Associate Editor of financial news at Market signals where he writes and edits original analysis in and around the wealth management, as well as other parts of the financial markets and economy. He has more than five years of experience editing, proofreading, and fact-checking content on current financial events and politics.







